15 (Long) Minutes With ‘The Last Supper’
By Michael Kimmelman
Published: July 13, 2011
MILAN
— The setting can seem a lot like quarantine. The entrance, through
several holding pens and sets of automatic doors, leads to an enormous,
vaulted, semiprivate room, the patient stretched out to the right. A
bedside crowd coos appropriately.
Occasionally I have joined that
crowd, before Leonardo da Vinci’s “Last Supper,” in the former
whitewashed refectory of Santa Maria delle Grazie, checking in on a
beloved, hospice-bound but faded relative, expecting to make the most of
the allotted 15 minutes tourists are permitted. Jesus delivers his
message of betrayal, as always, and the shock wave disperses his
apostles above the broad white tablecloth like bowling pins. It was a
rainy, cold morning the last time I stopped in to see the picture, whose
fuzziness and fragility don’t altogether obscure the flashes of coral,
blue and pink. I started daydreaming about waves on a Caribbean beach.
I
scribbled notes about economy of form and the faraway landscape, but
the image kept slipping out of focus, up there high on the wall, in the
glare of spotlights, with a buzz of people around and the clock ticking.
Why
are the greatest, or anyway, the most familiar works of art sometimes
the hardest to concentrate on? Is it the problem of seeing afresh what
we think we already know in our minds’ eyes? Friends of mine, art
historians, have lamented they can no longer abide “The Last Supper”
because it’s too sad in its current state and they hate being hustled
from the room after a quarter of an hour. I’m reminded of the borscht
belt joke about the guy who complains about the restaurant that serves
lousy food in such teensy portions.
But I’d bet most people are
grateful for the time limit. How often these days do we pause for even a
full minute before any work of art? I notice that visitors to Santa
Maria delle Grazie tend to peer a few times at the Leonardo, in between
scanning the labels fastened to the railing beneath the painting, then,
after a few minutes, they amble toward the other fresco in the room,
near the exit, stealing glimpses at their watches, as if calculating the
moment it might be acceptable to slip out of the room.
Maybe
Leonardo’s time has passed. Maybe that’s part of the problem. He belongs
to another era, steeped in antique rhetoric and faulty materials. Like
Laserdiscs, Yugoslavia and the ailing Czarevich Alexei, his “Last
Supper” came into this world already ill fated. Not 20 years after it
was finished, in 1498, it began to flake.
Giorgio Vasari, the
artist and Leonardo’s biographer, declared it a ruin a few decades
later. Poor restorations, alterations to the refectory, along with
centuries of pollution and the occasional war left the picture in the
condition I first discovered it, in the half light of a late summer
afternoon, as a teenage art pilgrim during the late 1970s, shortly
before it underwent its last round of reconstructive surgery.
That
last round took 21 years. An altogether different painting appeared on
newspaper front pages, previous restorations stripped away and vacant
patches of lost pigment filled in by watercolor. The work looked
ghostly, like breath on glass. Nostalgists fumed, naturally, but the
patient was at least stable, conservators responded, and what survived
of it demanded our forbearance. Viewing hours were henceforth to be by
appointment only, 15 minutes per customer, for our sake and the art’s.
And
so the picture I found filthy but florid during the gritty days of late
Fellini and the Red Brigade had been reborn into the fastidious age of
soy milk and nanotechnology. In lieu of lone pilgrims and natural light,
package tourists making online bookings joined artificial lights that
flattened the image. Modernized in its new climate- and crowd-control
environment, one of the most familiar pictures in the history of art
suddenly seemed alien, like vacuum-packed heirloom tomatoes and
no-smoking parks. Even the time limit, a courtesy of the modern
hospitality industry, only discouraged visitors from getting to the
bottom of the bottomless.
We get the culture we deserve in the
end, which represents us. The other morning I found myself drifting with
the crowd toward the room’s second fresco, a huge Renaissance
Crucifixion by Giovanni Donato da Montorfano: horses, soldiers and
throngs of figures mill at the bases of crosses that tower like
sequoias, rising into lunettes beneath the ceiling.
It’s a splendid, colorful work, I thought, then glanced back toward the Leonardo.
And almost uncons |
No comments:
Post a Comment